← All topicsList Management & HygieneRe-engagement & Sunsetting (Engagement Hygiene)
Accuracy / correctness · 1
accuracyArticle says '2-3 emails over two weeks' and my script matches (two or three emails, ~two weeks). The aiSummary hedges the inactivity window as 'roughly 6 to 12 months' rather than a hard number; my script says 'months' without a number, which is safe and avoids an unhedged benchmark. No drift, but note the article itself uses 6-12 months as the identification window while 001's body never states a day-window, so keeping it vague in the video is defensible.
What is a re-engagement campaign (win-back campaign)?
Question: 005.010.001 · What is a re-engagement campaign (win-back campaign)? · ~2:45 · single-question video
COLD OPEN
The "we miss you" email. Does it actually do anything?

You've gotten one. "We miss you. Here's what's new." That's a re-engagement campaign, also called a win-back. And it's not a guilt trip, it's the last thing you send someone before you let them go.

⬡ title-card, headline "Re-engagement / win-back", subtitle "the goodbye that isn't quite goodbye"
BEAT 1, the one-line answer

A re-engagement campaign is a short sequence of emails aimed at subscribers who've gone quiet. People who haven't opened or clicked anything in months. You're asking them one honest question: do you still want to hear from us?

⬡ journey-flow, three envelopes going out to a dimmed "silent subscriber" node
BEAT 2, what it looks like

In practice it's two or three emails over about two weeks. The first is soft: "we miss you, here's what's new." The next reminds them why they signed up in the first place. The last one names the stakes: "this is your last chance to stay." If they still don't budge, you remove them.

⬡ timeline, three points across two weeks: "We miss you" · "Remember why you're here" · "Last chance"
BEAT 3, why bother (the real reason)
Silent subscribers aren't harmless.

Here's why it matters. Keeping people who never open isn't harmless. Mailbox providers watch how your audience reacts, and a pile of dead-quiet addresses drags your engagement down and your reputation with it. Some of those old addresses can even get recycled into spam traps. A win-back gives them a real chance to raise their hand. If they don't, you clean them off. Either way, you win.

⬡ split-compare, LEFT "Keep mailing the silent" (reputation bar sinks) vs RIGHT "Win-back, then remove" (bar holds steady)
TAKEAWAY

So a re-engagement campaign is a quick, honest "do you still want this?" to your quiet subscribers. Responders stay. Everyone else gets a graceful exit. That's the whole idea.

⬡ title-card, "Ask once. Honestly. Then let go."
NEXT / SUBSCRIBE

If that cleared it up, subscribe, we're answering every list-hygiene question one at a time. Next up: when should you actually run one of these?

⬡ end-card, Subscribe + Next: "When to run a re-engagement campaign" (005.010.002)
DESCRIPTION

What is a re-engagement campaign (also called a win-back campaign)? It's a short sequence of two to three emails, sent over about two weeks, to subscribers who haven't opened or clicked in months. You ask them one honest question: do you still want to hear from us? Responders stay on your active list. Everyone who ignores the whole sequence gets removed.

Why it matters: quiet-but-valid subscribers still hurt you. They drag your engagement metrics down, which is exactly what mailbox providers watch, and long-dormant addresses can get recycled into spam traps. A win-back gives inactive subscribers a real chance to opt back in before you clean them off.

Next: When should you run a re-engagement campaign? → [link 005.010.002]

Full written guide → reviewmyemails.com/emailalmanac

#email #deliverability #listhygiene

CONNECTIONS
• next: 005.010.002 When should I run a re-engagement campaign?
• related: 005.010.008 Benefits of sunsetting inactive contacts · 005.009.001 What are spam traps?
• vocab: re-engagement campaign, win-back, sunset, spam trap