Can email design elements be A/B tested?

Still have a question, spotted an error, or have a better explanation or a source we should cite?

Yes, you absolutely can A/B test email design elements. The better question is which ones actually move the needle, and how do you measure something as subtle as a visual change.

First, a quick note on what A/B testing means here. You split your audience into two groups, send each group a version with one design change, then compare how each group behaves. Clicks are your best signal for design tests. Opens tell you about subject lines. Clicks tell you whether the design itself made it easier (or harder) for someone to take action.

The design elements worth testing are things like single-column versus multi-column layouts, button color and size, image placement and scale, how much white space you use, and whether a navigation bar at the top of your email helps or hurts. These all affect how someone scans and interacts with your email, especially on mobile.

A few things that make design testing trickier than subject line testing. First, the effects tend to be smaller, so you need a larger audience to reach statistical significance (the point where you can trust the result isn't just random luck). A good rule of thumb is at least 1,000 subscribers per variant before drawing conclusions. Second, design and content interact constantly. If you change your layout and your copy at the same time, you won't know which change drove the result. Test one thing at a time, even if it's slower.

But the other wrinkle is rendering. A two-column layout might look elegant in Gmail on desktop and completely fall apart on Apple Mail on iPhone. If your ESP gives you device-level data, check results broken down by mobile versus desktop. A design win overall can be hiding a mobile loss underneath it.

If your platform supports click maps or heat maps, use them during design tests. They tell you where people are actually clicking, not just whether they clicked at all. That's useful context when you're trying to figure out if a button placement change worked.

The short answer is that design variables do impact performance, just more gradually than copy changes. Think of design tests as a long game. Run them, document what you learn, and build a picture of what your specific audience responds to over time. (Of course, that takes patience. But the answers you get are yours, not borrowed from someone else's best practices.)

Not sure where to start? Our SOS hotline is free and we're happy to help you figure out what's worth testing for your setup.

Contributors

Who worked on this answer

Every name links to their profile. Every company links to their site. Real people, real accountability.

Ask an AI · tailored to your setup

Get a ranked testing plan for your email design

I want to A/B test email design elements with my subscribers. Based on my setup, which design variables are most likely to impact engagement? Please give me a ranked list of what to test first, what metrics to track for each, and any pitfalls to watch out for (like rendering differences or sample size issues).

Edit the yellow boxes, then send to the AI of your choice.