Can dynamic content blocks be A/B tested?

Still have a question, spotted an error, or have a better explanation or a source we should cite?

Yes, you can A/B test dynamic content blocks. But here's the catch: you're not just testing copy or a hero image. You're testing logic. That changes how you set up the experiment and what you measure.

A standard A/B test swaps one static element for another. When you test a dynamic block, you're asking a bigger question. Does recommendation engine A outperform recommendation engine B? Does showing a personalized block at all beat a static fallback? Does the block placement change behavior?

Those are all testable, but each one needs its own clean experiment. Don't change the algorithm and the placement at the same time. You'll have no idea which variable moved the needle.

Here are the four most common things worth testing in dynamic content:

  • Algorithm vs. algorithm. Run "Best Sellers" logic against "Recently Browsed" logic in the same slot for two random audience halves. Track clicks specifically on that block, not just total email clicks.
  • Dynamic block vs. static block. Does personalization actually help? Swap the dynamic block for a curated, static alternative in the B variant. You might be surprised what wins.
  • Block placement. Top of email vs. below the main CTA. Placement affects whether the personalized content gets seen at all before someone clicks or closes.
  • Personalization depth. Tightly targeted content (based on purchase history) vs. broadly relevant content (top category picks) vs. no personalization at all. This one reveals whether your data is actually good enough to drive lift.

What you track matters too. Total click rate on the email isn't enough. You want click rate on the dynamic block specifically, conversion rate from those clicks, and how the results break down by segment. A recommendation engine might work brilliantly for high-purchase subscribers and fall flat for new ones. If you only look at the aggregate, you'll miss that story.

One thing worth keeping in mind: dynamic content tests need enough volume to be meaningful. If your list is small or your send frequency is low, you might not reach statistical significance quickly. Plan your test duration before you start, not after you see early results.

Platforms like Klaviyo, Braze, and Iterable all support dynamic block A/B testing to varying degrees. How much control you get over block-level click tracking depends on your ESP, so it's worth checking what data you can actually pull before you design the test.

And if you want to go deeper, our almanac covers how to measure personalization uplift in detail. Worth reading before you run your first algorithm test.

Contributors

Who worked on this answer

Every name links to their profile. Every company links to their site. Real people, real accountability.

Ask an AI · tailored to your setup

Design my dynamic content A/B test

I want to A/B test dynamic content blocks in my email campaigns. Based on what I share below, help me design a clean experiment with a clear hypothesis, the right control and variant setup, and the specific metrics I should track at the block level. Tell me what I need to watch for so I don't end up with results I can't trust. 1. What does the dynamic block currently do? (e.g., product recommendations, personalized offers, location-based content) 2. What ESP or platform are you using? 3. What's your typical send volume per campaign? 4. What result are you hoping personalization drives? (clicks, conversions, revenue per email) 5. Have you tested this block before, or is this your first time?

Edit the yellow boxes, then send to the AI of your choice.