Should I test length, personalization, emojis, or tone?

Still have a question, spotted an error, or have a better explanation or a source we should cite?

You've got four variables worth testing in your subject lines: length, personalization, emojis, and tone. The real question isn't whether to test them. It's which one to run first so you get the fastest, clearest signal.

Here's a practical order to work through, based on what tends to move the needle most for most senders. Your audience may surprise you, and that's kind of the point.

1. Tone first. Urgent versus casual, formal versus friendly. Tone shapes the emotional response before a reader even processes the words. A subject line that reads "Your account needs attention" hits very differently from "Quick heads up from us." Test these on a decent chunk of your list (at least 1,000 per variant if you can), give it 4 hours minimum before calling a winner, and look beyond opens to actual clicks or conversions.

2. Personalization second. Adding a first name or referencing something behavioral ("You browsed X last week") can produce strong lifts, but only when it feels earned. If your data is messy and half your subscribers have "First_Name" in the field, you'll hurt yourself. Clean data is the prerequisite here. Test name inclusion against no name, or try a location reference if that's relevant to your content.

3. Length third. Short subject lines (under 40 characters) versus longer descriptive ones. This matters most on mobile, where preview space is tight. Some audiences want the full story upfront. Others click faster when you leave them curious. Neither is universally right. Test to find your baseline, then hold it steady while you run other experiments.

4. Emojis last. Not because they don't matter, but because they're the most audience-dependent variable of the four. Emojis can lift opens noticeably for some lists and tank them for others. B2B audiences and financial or medical senders often see drops. Consumer lifestyle brands often see gains. Test one emoji placement (leading the subject line) against none, and watch the data. Don't assume either way.

A few things that trip up a lot of testers: running tests with too small a sample size (under 500 per variant gives you noise, not insight), declaring a winner too early, and only measuring opens. Opens are a starting point, not the finish line. An emoji might pop your open rate and crater your click rate. That's useful information, not a win.

Build a simple roadmap. One test per send, one variable at a time, documented results. After four or five rounds you'll have real data about what your audience responds to rather than borrowed assumptions from someone else's list.

So if you want a quick sanity check on your subject lines before you test, try our free Subject Line Tester to spot any obvious flags before your campaign goes out.

Contributors

Who worked on this answer

Every name links to their profile. Every company links to their site. Real people, real accountability.

Ask an AI · tailored to your setup

Build my subject line testing roadmap

I want to run A/B tests on my subject lines but I'm not sure what to prioritize. I'm sending email type, e.g. newsletter / promotional / transactional to [audience description, e.g. B2B SaaS users / e-commerce shoppers] and my current open rate is around X%. My list size is roughly number of subscribers. Can you give me a ranked testing roadmap for length, personalization, emojis, and tone, with suggested variants to run first and what metrics to watch beyond opens?

Edit the yellow boxes, then send to the AI of your choice.